The author incorporated her citations into her sentences smoothly. Some sentences were very boring, and some paragraphs needed to be in a different order. Other than that, I believe the paper was okay.
The author worked really hard it seemed like to incorporate her quotes and citations so that they flowed. This was apparent and therefore made each paragraph easier to read. She did a good job showing her opinion that students should vote, but also gave many good reasons why students simply sometimes don't care enough.
This essay was good but I found some paragraphs to be wordy and boring.It is more than clear that this author is on the side to vote rather than not too, but she presents both sides fairly. Her citations seemed fine and I definelty know where she got her information form. Overall in my opinion it was a good essay but a bit boring.
I think she did a good job. It wasn’t the most interesting paper to read but everything flow smoothly. She overall used the right citations at the right time and stated both sides on why people between the ages18-24 voted and why they didn’t voted. She also presented that she felt that people between the ages 18-24 should vote clearly. There were a few paragraphs that were too long and boring but it was good paper overall.
The paper was written well, but it was boring. She did a good job on incorporating statistics in the paper. The paper flowed pretty smoothly, but there were some parts that could have been reordered. She also does a good job on giving both sides to the argument.
The essay was alright. She blended her citations and sentences very well. I found her essay could have been a little bit livelier, it seemed a little boring. She seemed partial on voting, and her opinion was very clear. Other than the fact that it was not to interesting, it was okay.
In all this paper was a decent research paper. Many facts and details gave needed support to the topic. The paper was a bit bland at some points, but overall supported her purpose. She used her citations in a nice correct manner
This was a pretty well written research paper. The author used facts and citations correctly but could have used better details. It was interesting but did not grab my attention like I felt it should have.
The author worked hard to incorporate her quotes and sources into the paper. Although she did a good job doing this i found that it also made the paper very boring. Structurally it was a well written paper but overall i find it to be very uninteresting.
I loved the author's paper. I felt she did a great job in the organization of her paragraphs. You could tell she did a lot of research and I think she cited in all the right places. The paper kept my attention the whole time, and she definitely got her point across about young voters.
The essay had good flow. The author did a good job incorporating citations and statistics throughout the essay. I found that the paper was kind of uninteresting. Soem of the paragraphs were very long.
I think the author touched points on certain details about young voters, and implemented key statistics and details where they were needed. She also pointed out both sides of the issues, instead of just showing a one sided argument. overall it was a decent paper
I thought the paper was very well written and the other did a good job on it. However, I don't think her citations were made in the best possible way. Her stats that she used were very good and helpful but she could have presented where she got them from in a different way. It was not very interesting to read, but she got her point across what she wanted to say.
The paper was well-writen but in he end was boring. The paragraphs were too long but she did a good job with citations. She did a good job researching and it was a good paper all-around, although not very fun to read.
The author did a good job in her essay. i kind of felt like it was a little too wordy though but it was not a major problem. The essay had a good flow to it and her citations and quotes seemed fine. the author could have did a little more to make it interesting to people that are not into this subject.
The paper was a little boring and i kind of felt like the author dragged it on a bit in the paragraphs. But she did do a good job with the citations. And she was a little bit redundant.
The author is fair to both sides but is clearly for voting. Her use of statistics helped to sway the reader and further displayed her point. The paper was solid and presented plenty facts, but at times it seemed to drag on.
At first I had a hard time understanding what side of the arguement the author was on, wether she was for or against voting. But with good additions of quotations, I soon realized that she was indeed for voting. I just think that she could have taken a firmer stance on the subject.
Post a Comment